Chalo Chatu:Editorial Handbook: Difference between revisions

From Chalo Chatu, Zambia online encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m Protected "Chalo Chatu:Editorial Handbook": High traffic page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 06:17, 13 September 2025

Template:Policy




This handbook expands upon the Editorial Policy of Chalo Chatu. It provides step-by-step processes, transparency tools, and day-to-day guidance for editors, reviewers, and administrators.

Relationship to the Editorial Policy

  • The Chalo Chatu:Editorial Policy sets the **binding rules and authority** for Chalo Chatu.
  • This handbook explains **how those rules are applied in practice**.
  • Where there is conflict, the Policy takes precedence.

Editorial Workflow

  1. Drafting: Contributors (vetted and appointed) prepare articles.
  2. Review: Reviewers check for neutrality, accuracy, sourcing, and formatting.
  3. Approval: Administrators or senior editors approve and publish the article.
  4. Maintenance: Articles are periodically updated, corrected, or archived as needed.

Quick Reference

  • Contributors → create content.
  • Reviewers → verify content.
  • Administrators → enforce rules, finalize, and protect.

Transparency Practices

To strengthen credibility, Chalo Chatu maintains open reporting mechanisms:

Correction and Error Handling

  • Minor factual errors should be corrected within **7 days** of being reported.
  • Disputes must first be discussed on the article’s talk page.
  • If unresolved, the matter is referred to the Editorial Board.
  • All corrections must be logged in the Chalo Chatu:Correction log.

Article Labels

Articles may carry one of the following notices:

Note: This article is supported by published, traceable sources.

– Fully referenced and fact-checked.

Note: This article is based on oral tradition, interviews, and community memory. It has been reviewed according to Chalo Chatu's oral history guidelines.

– Based on oral accounts that have passed validation protocols.

Notice: This article covers an ongoing or developing event. Information may change as updates are made. It may not yet reflect the most current developments.

– Covers ongoing or unfolding events, requiring updates.

Source Handling

Tiered Sources

  • Tier 1: Government records, academic works, archival documents, reputable newspapers.
  • Tier 2: Books, peer-reviewed journals, NGO publications.
  • Tier 3: Oral history (requires two or more confirmations + cultural authority validation).

Social Media Sources

  • Official posts from government institutions or verified officials (Facebook, X, WhatsApp) may be cited.
  • Such posts must be archived and linked for verification.

Ethical Standards in Practice

  • Editors must write respectfully about living persons.
  • Oral traditions must be documented with cultural sensitivity.
  • No defamatory or promotional content is permitted.
  • Editors must disclose potential conflicts of interest to the Editorial Board.

Audits and Reviews

  • Quarterly audits select random articles for compliance checks.
  • Audit results are published openly on Chalo Chatu:Audit Reports.
  • Articles failing audits are flagged for revision or removal.

Governance and Reporting

  • The Editorial Board appoints contributors and reviewers.
  • The Board publishes annual “State of the Encyclopedia” reports.
  • Contributors are accountable to the Board for quality and ethical standards.

Updates to This Handbook

  • Minor clarifications may be updated by administrators.
  • Major changes require Editorial Board approval.
  • All updates are recorded at Chalo Chatu:Policy history.

Template:Chalo Chatu policies