Chalo Chatu:Editorial Handbook: Difference between revisions
Chalochatu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chalochatu (talk | contribs) m Protected "Chalo Chatu:Editorial Handbook": High traffic page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 06:17, 13 September 2025
This handbook expands upon the Editorial Policy of Chalo Chatu. It provides step-by-step processes, transparency tools, and day-to-day guidance for editors, reviewers, and administrators.
Relationship to the Editorial Policy
- The Chalo Chatu:Editorial Policy sets the **binding rules and authority** for Chalo Chatu.
- This handbook explains **how those rules are applied in practice**.
- Where there is conflict, the Policy takes precedence.
Editorial Workflow
- Drafting: Contributors (vetted and appointed) prepare articles.
- Review: Reviewers check for neutrality, accuracy, sourcing, and formatting.
- Approval: Administrators or senior editors approve and publish the article.
- Maintenance: Articles are periodically updated, corrected, or archived as needed.
Quick Reference
- Contributors → create content.
- Reviewers → verify content.
- Administrators → enforce rules, finalize, and protect.
Transparency Practices
To strengthen credibility, Chalo Chatu maintains open reporting mechanisms:
- Chalo Chatu:Editorial Reports – Monthly summaries of editorial actions.
- Chalo Chatu:Correction log – Record of reported and resolved errors.
- Chalo Chatu:Audit Reports – Quarterly independent article reviews.
- Chalo Chatu:Policy history – Archive of all policy and handbook changes.
Correction and Error Handling
- Minor factual errors should be corrected within **7 days** of being reported.
- Disputes must first be discussed on the article’s talk page.
- If unresolved, the matter is referred to the Editorial Board.
- All corrections must be logged in the Chalo Chatu:Correction log.
Article Labels
Articles may carry one of the following notices:
Note: This article is supported by published, traceable sources.
– Fully referenced and fact-checked.
Note: This article is based on oral tradition, interviews, and community memory. It has been reviewed according to Chalo Chatu's oral history guidelines.
– Based on oral accounts that have passed validation protocols.
Notice: This article covers an ongoing or developing event. Information may change as updates are made. It may not yet reflect the most current developments.
– Covers ongoing or unfolding events, requiring updates.
Source Handling
Tiered Sources
- Tier 1: Government records, academic works, archival documents, reputable newspapers.
- Tier 2: Books, peer-reviewed journals, NGO publications.
- Tier 3: Oral history (requires two or more confirmations + cultural authority validation).
Social Media Sources
- Official posts from government institutions or verified officials (Facebook, X, WhatsApp) may be cited.
- Such posts must be archived and linked for verification.
Ethical Standards in Practice
- Editors must write respectfully about living persons.
- Oral traditions must be documented with cultural sensitivity.
- No defamatory or promotional content is permitted.
- Editors must disclose potential conflicts of interest to the Editorial Board.
Audits and Reviews
- Quarterly audits select random articles for compliance checks.
- Audit results are published openly on Chalo Chatu:Audit Reports.
- Articles failing audits are flagged for revision or removal.
Governance and Reporting
- The Editorial Board appoints contributors and reviewers.
- The Board publishes annual “State of the Encyclopedia” reports.
- Contributors are accountable to the Board for quality and ethical standards.
Updates to This Handbook
- Minor clarifications may be updated by administrators.
- Major changes require Editorial Board approval.
- All updates are recorded at Chalo Chatu:Policy history.